What the Research Shows
- The authors reviewed 705 articles, four of which met the inclusion criteria.
- Two randomized controlled trials compared:
- Telehealth with face-to-face treatment
- Telehealth with a postal-based approach
- The remaining two studies provided follow-up data and cost analyses for telehealth versus postal evaluations.
- Women receiving pelvic floor rehabilitation via telehealth experienced:
- Reduced incontinence episodes and voiding frequency
- Enhanced PFM strength
- Better overall quality of life
- In some cases, telehealth outcomes surpassed those of in-person treatment.
What This Means for Clinical Care
-
Telehealth can be a practical and effective mode of delivering pelvic floor therapy.
-
May serve as a viable alternative when in-person access is limited.
-
Can provide equivalent — and sometimes superior — outcomes compared to face-to-face care.
A Multidisciplinary Approach
-
Collaboration between pelvic floor PTs, primary care, and telehealth platforms supports holistic treatment.
-
Can increase access for women in rural or underserved areas.
-
Aligns with patient-centered goals to improve quality of life and functional outcomes.
- da Mata, K. R. U., Costa, R. C. M., Carbone, É. D. S. M., Gimenez, M. M., Bortolini, M. A. T., Castro, R. A., & Fitz, F. F. (2021). Telehealth in the rehabilitation of female pelvic floor dysfunction: a systematic literature review. International Urogynecology Journal, 32, 249-259.
Get provider-only pricing, ready-to-share patient resources, and clinical training – whatever your specialty. Become and Intimate Rose Partner